Owned-domain evidence · September 12, 2026
Public AI Visibility Sample Report
Inspect a real VisiScan self-scan with 30 live answer observations, exact prompts, engine coverage, limitations, and downloadable raw answers.
Result at a glance
VisiScan appeared in 5 of 30 valid observations (16.7%). The versioned product score was 8/100 because it applies question weights. Gemini was unavailable and excluded from the denominator.
Engine coverage
| Engine | Valid observations | VisiScan mentioned | Answers with citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 10 | 2 | 2 |
| Claude | 10 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity | 10 | 2 | 5 |
Exact question panel
- What is the best business near US?
- I need an emergency business in US right now, who should I call?
- Is VisiScan a trustworthy business in US?
- How does VisiScan compare to other businesses in US?
- How much does a business typically charge in US?
The profiler classified VisiScan as OTHER, producing generic and sometimes irrelevant prompts. This defect makes the report useful as a transparent failure example, not as a SaaS-industry benchmark.
Evidence and limitations
Every row preserves the exact prompt and provider answer, engine, sample, timestamp, mention classification, citation domains, latency and LIVE provenance. Automated mention labels still require human review before a consequential decision.
This is VisiScan's owned-domain self-scan. It does not replace the outstanding requirement for a separately consented local-business sample report.